[RegCNET] Fw: (no subject)

[abubakr salih]

Hi Ismaila,
Thank you for your reply. The convection
scheme I used is Grell with Fritsch and Chappell closure assumption.
icup = 2;
igcc = 2;
Unfortunately, due to some storage
limitation I kept only the SRF and ATM data.
Regards
Abubakr
 



On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 11:15 AM, abubakr salih <abubakr_salih at yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Hi Ismaila,
Thank you for your reply. The convection scheme I used is Grell with Fritsch and Chappell closure assumption.
icup = 2;
igcc = 2;
Unfortunately, due to some storage limitation I kept only the SRF and ATM data.
Regards
Abubakr



On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 10:42 AM, Ismaila Diallo <ismailadiallo64 at yahoo.fr> wrote:
 
Hi Abubakr,

Which convection scheme did you use in your simulation? For the daily I think instead of using the 3hrly output from *SRF* you can directly the output from *STS*. Data in *STS* are already daily. 

Let me know.

Best,

Ismaila



On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 10:26 AM, abubakr salih <abubakr_salih at yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Dear friends,
 
 
The attached
figure shows result of precipitation in mm/day from RegCM4.3.5.6 across some part
of Africa. The domain of this simulation was similar to Africa-CORDEX
domain. As you can see from the figure RegCM4 overestimates precipitation over
this region compared with TRMM and other models (REMO, RCA) for the time period 1998-2008.
The output of the simulation was three hourly in Kg m-2 s-1.
I used cdo to get the daily mean and multiplied by 86400 to get it in mm/day. 
 
I got the same
result when I used different domain size (smaller). Is there anyone experience such
a thing?
 
Regards,
Abubakr, MISU
Stockholm
University
_______________________________________________
RegCNET mailing list
RegCNET at lists.ictp.it
https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo.cgi/regcnet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ictp.it/pipermail/regcnet/attachments/20131204/4463ecab/attachment-0001.htm>