[RegCNET] RegCM3 and MCS

Gregory Jenkins gregory.s.jenkins at gmail.com
Sat Feb 13 14:10:15 CET 2010


Hello Vincent.  The MCSs are very difficult to simulate, especially squall
lines.  In general you need to be at 20 km or less, using non-hydrostatic
conditions and cloud microphysics.The best simulations that I have seen in
the literature are at this scale or at finer scales of 5-12 km.  The NCEP
reanalysis and ERA40 can provide the overall forcing (such as wind shear or
AEW forcing).

Greg

On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Vincent Lanre Ajayi <vincentajayi at yahoo.com
> wrote:

> Dear all,
> I have been trying to use RegCM3 to run West African Mesoscale Convective
> System. My questions are:
>
> (1) Can RegCM3 simulate West African MCS, if yes, at what resolution and
> the best input data (ERA40 or NCEP reanalysis).
>
> (2) Which of the RegCM out can MCS be observed,  OLR, or is there cloud top
> temperature in RegCM3 output.
>
> Please help with these questions,  am new to RegCM3
> Vincent
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RegCNET mailing list
> RegCNET at lists.ictp.it
> https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo/regcnet
>



-- 
Gregory S. Jenkins, PhD
Chair, Department of Physics and Astronomy
Room 105 Thirkield Hall
2355 6th Street NW
Washington DC 20059
202-806-6245 (phone), 202-806-5830 (fax)
gjenkins at howard.edu, gregory.s.jenkins at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ictp.it/pipermail/regcnet/attachments/20100213/8890799c/attachment.html>


More information about the RegCNET mailing list