[RegCNET] Same outputs from two closure assumptions

[S. Faisal Saeed]

Dear Nazrul,

Both the closure assumptions work only with Grell, they have nothing to do 
with any other convective scheme.

Regards,
Faisal

> Dear All,
> I am using RegCM3 (version June 2006) for the simulation in South Asian
> domain (65-117E; 5-40N). It seems that outputs in Modified-Kuo scheme for
> both Arakawa-Schubert (AS) and Fritsch-Chappell (FC) closure assumptions 
> are
> same. However, for other convective schemes say Grell (or Emanuel) outputs
> of AS and FC are different (as expected). Does any one have such type of
> situation? How I can overcome this problem?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Nazrul
>
> Dr. Md. Nazrul Islam
> Associate Professor
> Department of Physics
> Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
> Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
> http://www.buet.ac.bd/phy/nazrul.htm
>
> Phone: 880 2 966 5650 (PABX)
> FAX: 880 2 861 3026, 880 2 861 3046
>
> _______________________________________________
> RegCNET mailing list
> RegCNET at lists.ictp.it
> https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo/regcnet
>