[RegCNET] Emannuel Precipitation Scheme

[jagadish karmacharya]

Hi Neil, 
  
  There is no need to worry on CFL violation message.
  Jagadish
  
  " Let me quote a previous reply on this isue :
  ========================
  
>Hi Afzaal,
>Don't worry about CFL violation. 
?Jeremy: Is this CFL check removed in the current regcm code, available 
>for 
>download?
>Moet
-- 
Quoting Afzaal Karori <afzaalkarori at yahoo.com>:
> Hi All
> I intend to simulate the precipitation, with RegCM3
> version released in Feb.'2005, using Emanule Scheme.
> For this purpose, I took 'icup=4' in the file
> 'regcm.in'. When I run the model it starts working but
> with following message for some time steps;
> ....
> ....
> OUT-history written date =    1992070106.000000
>  BATS variables written at   1992070106 
> 0.0000000000000000E+000
>  Writing rad fields at ktau =                      108
>  1992070106
>  BCs are ready from   1992070106  to   1992070112
>  EMAN CFL VIOLATION:           59          72 
> 0.1363766230217920
>  EMAN CFL VIOLATION:           59          72 
> 0.1417323542081985 "
===========

  Neil Davis <nndavis at unity.ncsu.edu> wrote:  I am running the Emannuel precipitation scheme, for a domain with 60 km 
grid spacing.  I am running the default timesteps in regcm.in but am 
getting an error EMAN CFL VIOLATION.  I was wondering which time step I 
should change to eliminate this error.

Thanks
Neil
_______________________________________________
RegCNET mailing list
RegCNET at lists.ictp.it
https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo/regcnet


		
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at 1¢/min.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ictp.it/pipermail/regcnet/attachments/20060327/4e7719ab/attachment-0002.html>