Hi Michael,

My personal experience is that it is still far from being stable. I tested it to simulate Hurricane Katrina using 3 km horizontal resolution plus 23 vertical layer (nested under 27 km case that covers almost entire Atlantic) but it crashes after couple of days even if i decrease the time step to very small numbers. It also creates some patchy output in the high resolution (at least in my version) case without any clue why. So, for non-hydrostatic applications i think you need to wait little bit more or you could choose any other model such as WRF, COSMO etc.

Regards,

--ufuk

From: "Michael Notaro" <mnotaro@wisc.edu>
To: "Sridhara Nayak" <sridharanayakiitkgp@gmail.com>, "RegCNET" <regcnet@lists.ictp.it>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 10:59:01 AM
Subject: Re: [RegCNET] Non-hydrostatic RegCM4

Thanks for your email.

As far as I can tell, these papers all use the hydrostatic version of the model,

not the non-hydrostatic, convection-resolving version.

Michael


Michael Notaro
Associate Director
Nelson Institute Center for Climatic Research
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Phone: (608) 261-1503
Email: mnotaro@wisc.edu


From: Sridhara Nayak <sridharanayakiitkgp@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 12:54 PM
To: Michael Notaro
Subject: Re: [RegCNET] Non-hydrostatic RegCM4
 
Dear Michael,
Follows are our few recent papers on RegCM4. Hope it helps.

Paper 1:
Nayak, S., Mandal, M., & Maity, S. (2017). Customization of regional climate model (RegCM4) over Indian region. Theoretical and applied climatology, 127(1-2), 153-168.

Paper 2:
Maity, S., Satyanarayana, A. N. V., Mandal, M., & Nayak, S. (2017). Performance evaluation of land surface models and cumulus convection schemes in the simulation of Indian summer monsoon using a regional climate model. Atmospheric Research, 197, 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.06.023 

Paper 3:
Maity, S., Mandal, M., Nayak, S., & Bhatla, R. (2017). Performance of cumulus parameterization schemes in the simulation of Indian Summer Monsoon using RegCM4. Atmósfera, 30(4), 287-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.20937/ATM.2017.30.04.02

Best Regards
Sridhara

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:55 AM, Michael Notaro <mnotaro@wisc.edu> wrote:

Are there any publications applying the non-hydrostatic version of RegCM4?


Or could anyone share their experience using the non-hydrostatic version,

in terms of its performance and potential challenges?


Thanks, Michael


Michael Notaro
Associate Director
Nelson Institute Center for Climatic Research
University of Wisconsin-Madison

_______________________________________________
RegCNET mailing list
RegCNET@lists.ictp.it
https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo/regcnet


_______________________________________________
RegCNET mailing list
RegCNET@lists.ictp.it
https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo/regcnet