...46 MB sorry, not GB<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 16 December 2010 14:24, James Ciarlo` <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:james.ciarlo@physics.org">james.ciarlo@physics.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

<div>Dear ALL,</div><div><br></div><div>I am having problems with the NetCDF output of RegCM4 and its use on GrADS. I used the following command..</div><div><br></div><font face="&#39;courier new&#39;, monospace">./rcm2netcdf -a -v p -t 199001 -e 200001 <a href="http://regcm.in" target="_blank">regcm.in</a></font><br clear="all">


The terminal window showed the following...<div><div><font face="&#39;courier new&#39;, monospace">Value not found : i_band</font></div><div><font face="&#39;courier new&#39;, monospace">Assuming non tropical BAND run.</font></div>


<div><font face="&#39;courier new&#39;, monospace">Found Atmospheric data ATM and processing...................</font></div></div><div><br></div><div><div>... and obtained a 46 GB NetCDF file. I opened it with GrADS for postprocessing, but when I displayed the data, the image showed strange lines instead of the map. And I cannot understand how this is so. <br>


<div></div></div><div><br></div><div>I had a similar problem with data from ESRL, but that was a result of processing and I solved it by downloading the original unprocessed files. Since there was no processing other than the production of the nc file, I cannot understand what the problem is.</div>


<div><br></div><div>I was hoping that somone might have encountered a similar problem before and could help me figure this out.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div></div><div><br></div><font color="#888888"><div>James Ciarlo`</div>


</font></blockquote></div><br>