[RegCNET] Some question on the runoff simulated by RegCM4.1.1

[Tefera Diro Gulilat]

Hi,
If you are looking at the SRF (rather than the corresponding clm output
) files, yes that's right there is a unit error (mm vs m) in the SRF
output for the runoff values in your CLM run, so either use the clm
files or just divide the run off value  (obtained from SRF) by 1000.
Other than this, you might get exceptionally large values in your CLM
run just for some grid points I think if your domain happened to contain
a wet/marsh? land cover category.

cheers,
Gulilat

On 05/24/2012 03:57 PM, xp_Liu wrote:
> Hi, everone
>  i compare the runoff simulated by regcm4.1.1_bats and regcm4.1.1_clm recently, i find that the runoff simulated by regcm4.1.1_clm are so large that it range from 0 to 17000 or even larger, and the unit in the ctl file is "kg m-2 day -1"(the ctl is obtained by the GrADSNcPrepare), and the runoff simulated by regcm4.1.1_bats is less than 100, i have did several simulations, the results are all the same, i think there must be someting wrong, may be the unit is wrong, am i right? who can help me?
>  
>  thank you!
>  best regards!
>  
>  
>  MTSAT
> _______________________________________________
> RegCNET mailing list
> RegCNET at lists.ictp.it
> https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo.cgi/regcnet