[RegCNET] CFL violation

Mosuoe Letuma emletuma35 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 28 10:18:41 CET 2012


Dear Tugba

Maybe it could have been better if you had included your regcm.in in the
massagege. However, please try making your *dt* to be just less than *3 X ds
* i.e *dt < 3ds*. But also *dt* should be a multiple of* radfrq*.
Please try this and we see if it works.

Good luck,

Letuma

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Tugba AGACAYAK <agacayak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I am running RegCM-4.1.1 with dust for 1993. It is working correctly until
> November and it gives an error in this month.
> Is there anybody having similar problem? Could you please help me?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Tugba
>
> SEARCH BC data for 1993110812
> READY  BC from     1993110806 to 1993110812
>  WHUUUUBBBASAAAGASDDWD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>  No more atmosphere here....
>  CFL violation detected, so model STOP
>  #####################################
>  #            DECREASE DT !!!!       #
>  #####################################
>   -------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
>   Fatal in file: mod_tendency.F90 at line:   2291
>   CFL VIOLATION
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RegCNET mailing list
> RegCNET at lists.ictp.it
> https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo.cgi/regcnet
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ictp.it/pipermail/regcnet/attachments/20120228/8f4d9c81/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the RegCNET mailing list