[RegCNET] CFL violation
Mosuoe Letuma
emletuma35 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 28 10:18:41 CET 2012
Dear Tugba
Maybe it could have been better if you had included your regcm.in in the
massagege. However, please try making your *dt* to be just less than *3 X ds
* i.e *dt < 3ds*. But also *dt* should be a multiple of* radfrq*.
Please try this and we see if it works.
Good luck,
Letuma
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Tugba AGACAYAK <agacayak at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am running RegCM-4.1.1 with dust for 1993. It is working correctly until
> November and it gives an error in this month.
> Is there anybody having similar problem? Could you please help me?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Tugba
>
> SEARCH BC data for 1993110812
> READY BC from 1993110806 to 1993110812
> WHUUUUBBBASAAAGASDDWD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> No more atmosphere here....
> CFL violation detected, so model STOP
> #####################################
> # DECREASE DT !!!! #
> #####################################
> -------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
> Fatal in file: mod_tendency.F90 at line: 2291
> CFL VIOLATION
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RegCNET mailing list
> RegCNET at lists.ictp.it
> https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo.cgi/regcnet
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ictp.it/pipermail/regcnet/attachments/20120228/8f4d9c81/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the RegCNET
mailing list