[RegCNET] mismatch in averaging!
Smz Rcm
smzrcm at yahoo.fr
Fri Dec 11 11:41:25 CET 2009
I used postproc.x
but in postproc.in there are: DIURNALI AVG and CONTINUOUS AVG!
these two options don't give the same result for Tmin and Tmax
so wich I have to use?
regards
--- En date de : Ven 11.12.09, bixq <bixq at ictp.it> a écrit :
De: bixq <bixq at ictp.it>
Objet: Re: [RegCNET] mismatch in averaging!
À: "Smz Rcm" <smzrcm at yahoo.fr>
Cc: regcnet at lists.ictp.it
Date: Vendredi 11 Décembre 2009, 10h34
Hi, Sassi:
Correct ! for the following 5 fields in SRF file:
tgmax, tgmin, t2max, t2min, w10max and ps_min
You have to run postproc.f (or day_SRF.f) firstly.
(https://lists.ictp.it/pipermail/regcnet/2009/001900.html)
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Smz Rcm wrote:
> Dear RegCMers,
> I tried some simulations using ReGCM3 with ERA40 and with EH50M data, but after the postprocessing step, I had some doubt about Tmin and Tmax values, because when I make a diurnal averaging I get more realistic values than when making daily continuous averaging. and the difference is really important!
> so what should I do please? I get Tmin and Tmax from the 8 averaged values of diurnal file?
> Thanks for help
> Sassi
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Xunqiang Bi email:bixq at ictp.it
Earth System Physics Group
The Abdus Salam ICTP
Strada Costiera, 11
P.O. BOX 586, 34100 Trieste, ITALY
Tel: +39-040-2240302 Fax: +39-040-2240449
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ictp.it/pipermail/regcnet/attachments/20091211/3f2a40b9/attachment.html>
More information about the RegCNET
mailing list