[RegCNET] Re : Undefined values in ECHAM Run!

[Bamba Sylla]

Hi, 
Did you use the same code and settings to run your present day simulation? Can you tell us which resolution you are using? Have you checked if your time steps in regcm.in are fine?

Cheers ...

 
***************************************************
Mouhamadou Bamba SYLLA
Post-Doc Position, PWC/ESP
International Centre for Theoretical Physics
Strada Costiera 11, 34100 Trieste, Italy
Office tel: 0039 040 2240 225
Cell: 0039 34 71 94 06 55
emails: msylla at ictp.it, syllabamba at yahoo.fr 
***************************************************




________________________________
De : Smz Rcm <smzrcm at yahoo.fr>
À : regcnet at lists.ictp.it
Envoyé le : Lun 7 Décembre 2009, 11 h 00 min 10 s
Objet : [RegCNET] Undefined values in ECHAM Run!


Dear RegCMers,
I'm trying to run RegCM3 for a future Projection (2020=). 
The PreProcessing steps were run successfully, but when running the model, I remark a NaN values in some fields, for example::
"
OUT-history written date =    2020042600.00000     
 BATS variables written at   2020042600  0.000000000000000E+000
 Writing rad fields at ktau =          576  2020042600
 BCs are ready from   2020042600   to   2020042606
     at day =    1.0399, ktau =        600 :  1st, 2nd time deriv of ps =  NaN         NaN        ,  no. of points w/convection =       0
 BATS variables written at   2020042603   180.000000000000     
     at day =    1.1267, ktau =        650 :  1st, 2nd time deriv of ps =  NaN         NaN        ,  no. of points w/convection =       0
     at day =    1.2135, ktau =        700 :  1st, 2nd time deriv of ps =  NaN         NaN        ,  no. of points w/convection =       0
           *** solar declination angle =  13.95 degrees.
  dectim =    8640.00000000000   
"
Please help me if I have to change something in order to make a successful run
Thank you very much in advance
Sassi


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ictp.it/pipermail/regcnet/attachments/20091207/43149ea5/attachment.html>