[RegCNET] discussion about the frequency of lateral boundary condition
XUNQIANG BI
bixq at ictp.it
Wed Jul 2 07:53:44 CEST 2008
Dear all:
The change frequency of lateral boundary condition issue was discussed
in several emails at RegCNET.
My understanding is that it is not good to use 12 hourly LBC data,
instead, we should use 6 (or 3) hourly LBC data, in order to have
the right diurnal cycle at lateral boundary places.
By default, RegCM use the exponential relaxation LBC scheme, Both
fields (U, V, T, and Q) and the trend fields (dU, dV, dT and dQ)
are used. so 12 hourly LBC data is not suitable to provide the right
diurnal cycle. For example, 0 UTC and 12 UTC data cannot describe
the diurnal temperature variation for regions around 90E.
Is my understanding correct ?
Regards,
Xunqiang Bi
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr. Xunqiang Bi email:bixq at ictp.it
Earth System Physics Group
The Abdus Salam ICTP
Strada Costiera, 11
P.O. BOX 586, 34100 Trieste, ITALY
Tel: +39-040-2240302 Fax: +39-040-2240449
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More information about the RegCNET
mailing list