[RegCNET] problem of postproc (forrtl: severe (64): input conversion error)

Nadja Insel nadinsel at umich.edu
Tue Apr 8 16:13:12 CEST 2008


Hi,

the problem is that two lines are missing in the postproc.in file 
(between iotype and header). You have to add .false., for usgs and plv.

Nadja

------------------------------------
Nadja Insel
PhD candidate
Department of Geological Sciences
University of Michigan
1100 N. University Ave
2534 C.C. Little
Ann Arbor, MI, 48104-1005 USA
------------------------------------



Quoting amy1086 <amy1086 at 163.com>:

> hello everyone,
> I have encoutered the input conversion error when I ran postproc.x. 
> Before that, I've already copied postproc.x ,user.in and postproc.in 
> into my working directory. Following is the error:
>
> ifort -tpp7 -O3 -cm -w -w90 -w95  -Vaxlib -convert big_endian  -o 
> postproc postproc.o netcdf.o -L../Commons/env/liblinux/ -lnetcdf 
> -Vaxlib -I../Commons/env/include
> ENTER THE TYPE OF REGCM OUTPUT TO BE PROCESSED:
>   ICBC (0=no; 1=yes)
>
>   ATM (0=no; 1=yes)
> 1
>   SRF (0=no; 1=yes)
>
>   RAD (0=no; 1=yes)
>
>   CHE (0=no; 1=yes)
>
>   SUB (0=no; 1=yes)
>
> forrtl: severe (64): input conversion error, unit 11, file 
> /regcm3/RegCM/PracticeRun/postproc.in
> Image              PC        Routine            Line        Source
> postproc           080F3B48  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> postproc           080F22E1  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> postproc           080CE56B  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> postproc           080A68AE  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> postproc           080BC66D  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> postproc           080BBD14  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> postproc           08049E01  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> postproc           0804978A  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> libc.so.6          006AEE23  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
> postproc           080496C1  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
>
> Does anyone know how to solve it? I would really appreciate all
> the help you can give me to be able to solve this problem.
>
>







More information about the RegCNET mailing list