New RegCM3 code [RegCNET]
Simon Krichak
shimon at cyclone.tau.ac.il
Thu Jun 15 18:56:46 CEST 2006
Hi,
A question on a different issue - may the ICBC files prepared for the old
model code be used for running the new RegCM?
Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moetasim" <mashfaq at purdue.edu>
To: <MarcPace at MIT.EDU>
Cc: <regcnet at lists.ictp.it>
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: [RegCNET] Post Processing
Hi,
I still have some things to finish in postproc. I will hand over the final
code to Bi by next week. However, until then, you can use the attached code.
->put postproc.f and postproc1.param in PostProc folder.
->put user.in in your run directory.
->Insead of old postproc.in, use the attached one (make changes for date and
file extensions accordingly).
You may not send email about postproc at RegCNET until final code in up on
web. Instead, you may ask me directly for any problem you come across.
Note: This code will not work for old RegCM, however, the final code will
work
for both old and new RegCM. Also, old code doesn't work for new RegCM.
Moet
Quoting Marc Pace Marcella <marcpace at MIT.EDU>:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been using the May 31st released version of RegCM and am having
> problems
> post processing the SRF data (getting a floating exception error.) Has
> anyone
> else run across this problem? I see that a new version came out a couple
> of
> days ago, were changes made to Post Proc, or is this an error of my own
> doing?
> I also tried the newest version's post proc on these runs and I get a
> different
> error regarding diurnal averaging. Any help would really be appreciated.
> Thanks!
> -Marc
> _______________________________________________
> RegCNET mailing list
> RegCNET at lists.ictp.it
> https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo/regcnet
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> RegCNET mailing list
> RegCNET at lists.ictp.it
> https://lists.ictp.it/mailman/listinfo/regcnet
>
More information about the RegCNET
mailing list